xlat in rlm_attr_filer
bjorn at mork.no
Tue Apr 25 15:12:08 CEST 2006
"Alan DeKok" <aland at nitros9.org> writes:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn_Mork?= <bjorn at mork.no> wrote:
>> But I found that rlm_attr_filter doesn't do xlat. So I was wondering
>> why? Is a patch welcome, or are there good reasons not to do this?
> I don't think there's any good reason for this.
> The patch shouldn't be too hard.
How about something like this? It does add a bit of overhead by
making an xlatted copy of the complete checklist, but this allows us
to _test against_ xlatted values in addition to adding them.
Thoughts? Unnecessary to xlat anything but the added attributes?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1917 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Freeradius-Devel