[PATCH 1/10] rlm_python: 01---sanitize-rlm-python-t.patch

[Nicolas Baradakis]

Alan DeKok wrote:

>   a) one person sending a patch and saying "it works" is OK for tiny
>      patches, but not for large ones.
>
>   b) large patches should be read and audited before being applied.
>
>   So far, few people have piped up for (a), and I haven't had time to
> do (b).

I agree: thanks to your advices, the quality of the server can keep up.
I was asking the question because rlm_python is an experimental
module, therefore I was thinking it's less important. (moreover the
users are saying it's almost unusable in its current state)

Since I'm not using rlm_python, I can't really say anything about the
changes. That's why I'll leave the CVS unchanged until you say the
patch is good to go.

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis