freeradius and openssl exception

[Stephen Gran]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:36:00PM -0400, Alan DeKok said:
> Stephen Gran <steve at lobefin.net> wrote:
> > That would be nice.  That still leaves us with the eap submodules that
> > expect to use openssl directly, though.  They are the ones that
> > represent clear problems for binary redistribution, and can only really
> > be solved within the freeradius project (well, or within the openssl
> > community, but as you pointed out, that seems unlikely).
> 
>   The copyright holders can do pretty much what they want with their
> software, including distributing binaries that others cannot.
> 
>   I suggest a debian apt repository on freeradius.org, containing
> nothing more than the modules in FreeRADIUS that link to OpenSSL.

If that seems like less work to maintain over time than getting an
openssl exception granted, I'm sure I can automate something to do that.
I think I would prefer a license exception in general, but I am not
going to create a fuss over it if you are opposed or feel that it's too
much overhead for some reason.

Take care,
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Stephen Gran                  | The mome rath isn't born that could     |
|  steve at lobefin.net             | outgrabe me.   -- Nicol Williamson      |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve |                                         |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/attachments/20060726/f4bed57e/attachment.pgp>