syslog patch to rlm_detail in 1.1.0

[Geoff Silver]

Alan DeKok wrote:

>>   I'd be much happier if the syslog functionality was in a separate
>> module, that didn't touch the "detail" module.  The functionality is
>> really quite separate, even if there is some overlap in the code.
>>
>>   I'd be OK with adding a "rlm_syslog" to the server, especially if it
>> could log authentication success/fail, etc. in place of what's
>> currently in the server core.  The current syslog functionality is
>> pretty bad, so replacing it with a module is a big win.


Seems perfectly reasonable.  I'll see if I can create an rlm_syslog that'll
work.  How would you like to receive it (I presume sending a 10k diff to the
mailing list probably isn't preferred)?

Thanks.