rfc4590

[Alexander Schrab]

I think I have a working version. But I can't test it with the old
version of digest (I had a test program, but it expired). How do you
usually test freeradius?

/Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> freeradius-devel-bounces+alexander.schrab=axis.com at lists.freer
> adius.org 
> [mailto:freeradius-devel-bounces+alexander.schrab=axis.com at lis
> ts.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: den 15 september 2006 16:34
> To: FreeRadius developers mailing list
> Subject: Re: rfc4590 
> 
> 
> "Alexander Schrab" <Alexander.Schrab at axis.com> wrote:
> > Well, the thing is that my patch only replaces the 
> attributes from the 
> > draft version. So it's an either or situation. It seems 
> like the draft 
> > version has some momentum already, but the rfc should really be the 
> > way to go (no strange subattributes and such).
> 
>   There's no harm in having both.
> 
> >  It's more of a political decision, should freeradius 
> suppotr only the 
> > rfc, only the draft or both? Maybe you can point me in the 
> direction 
> > of the people/person who made the digest module?
> 
>   That was me.
> 
>   I haven't looked at RFC 4590, but if the old digest 
> attributes can be modified to look like the new ones, that 
> would appear to be a solution.  i.e.
> 
>   authorize: if old-style, re-format, and make check items as old
>   authenticate: do new-style.  If check item is marked as old,
>                 send response in old format.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> --
> http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
> http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
>