rfc4590

[Alexander Schrab]

Ok, have a look at this. It works with both the old style and new style
of digest.  


/Alexander

On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 10:34 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> "Alexander Schrab" <Alexander.Schrab at axis.com> wrote:
> > Well, the thing is that my patch only replaces the attributes from the
> > draft version. So it's an either or situation. It seems like the draft
> > version has some momentum already, but the rfc should really be the way
> > to go (no strange subattributes and such).
> 
>   There's no harm in having both.
> 
> >  It's more of a political decision, should freeradius suppotr only
> > the rfc, only the draft or both? Maybe you can point me in the
> > direction of the people/person who made the digest module?
> 
>   That was me.
> 
>   I haven't looked at RFC 4590, but if the old digest attributes can
> be modified to look like the new ones, that would appear to be a
> solution.  i.e.
> 
>   authorize: if old-style, re-format, and make check items as old
>   authenticate: do new-style.  If check item is marked as old,
>                 send response in old format.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> --
> http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
> http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch2
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 21040 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/attachments/20060918/613cf8a3/attachment.bin>