Null SQL user

[Michael Griego]

On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Peter Nixon wrote:

> It doesn't really bother me, but this is different behaviour to other
> modules... Why rewrite it at all?

If we attempt to mimic the users file processing as close as  
posslble, it uses the DEFAULT entries.  This is exactly the reason  
that my take on this was to, if no User-Name is present, simply skip  
over the radcheck/radgroupcheck for the User-Name and jump straight  
to the DEFAULT profile checking.  In my mind, that most closely  
mimics users file processing, reduces confusion of modules behaving  
differently, keeps the code as close to the same as possible in how  
it operates, and accomplishes the goal of allowing requests with no  
username.

--Mike