SQL usergroup table

[Peter Nixon]

On Fri 22 Sep 2006 21:40, Guy Fraser wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 10:28 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > Peter Nixon <listuser at peternixon.net> wrote:
> > > Is there any reason why the "usergroup" table is not calle d"radgroup"
> > > by default to fit with the other radius tables?
> >
> >   No idea.  Let's try to be consistent in 2.0.
>
> Is it not because it maps users to groups ?
>
> "radgroup" could refer to any kind of group association but
> I can't think of any reason why it couldn't be changed,
> except that a note in really large letters should be put on
> the download page to ensure administrators don't get miffed
> when upgrading, and possibly getting bitten by the change.

I already changed it to radusergroup for precisely this reason :-)

Cheers

-- 

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/attachments/20060922/62494088/attachment.pgp>