1.1.7 rlm_detail locking is broken

[Alan DeKok]

Nicolas Baradakis wrote:
> Many thanks for the second patch, and thanks for doing the testing, too.
> Your efforts are lowering the amount of work on our side to a minimum.

  Yes.  It's much appreciated.

> I've reviewed your last patch and it looks ok to me. If Alan also
> agrees, I'll apply it to branch 1.1 of CVS.

  Looks good to me.

  We should release 1.1.8 soon.

  Also, if people can test the detail file handling in CVS head, that
would help a lot, too.  It's been completely re-written, and tested on
my systems.  But...

  Alan DeKok.