Conflict in attribute value for RFC 2868 dictionary
aland at deployingradius.com
Mon Feb 12 13:33:12 CET 2007
Geoffroy Arnoud wrote:
> I am wondering why the dictionary.rfc2868 isn't
> conform with RFC 2868.
Weird. Looking at CVS, the dictionary was created before the RFC, so
my suspicion is that it matches the drafts, but not the final document
> I think that the dictionary is broken, but updating it
> may have impact on existing deployements, using
> attribute values to set AVpairs.
I think that's possible, but not likely. Only the numbers 2,3, and 4
are wrong. The higher numbers were added later, and are correct. So
only people using X25, ATM, or Frame-Relay will be affected... except
that the NASes likely use the correct numbers, so they won't be using
the wrong values for 2..4.
> If required, I can post a patch.
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
More information about the Freeradius-Devel