PAM Module Patch and Feature

[Tomas Hoger]

On 3/25/07, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
> Frank Cusack wrote:
> >
> > I didn't design it, but it looks clearly like a bug.
>
>   It's a bug.  I had thought it was fixed in 1.1.x, but apparently not.
>
>   I'll change the default "reject_delay" to 0 in 1.1.6.
>
>   It is fixed in the CVS head, and I have patches pending that delete
> "request_list.c" and "request_process.c", which contain pretty horrible
> code.

Is it single issue causing both reject_delay and proxy retry
scheduling problems?  Can you sched some light on details of the
problem?  Is any patch planned for 1.1.x?

Thanks!

th.