PAM Module Patch and Feature

[David Mitchell]

Alan DeKok wrote:
> Tomas Hoger wrote:
> 
>> Is it single issue causing both reject_delay and proxy retry
>> scheduling problems?  Can you sched some light on details of the
>> problem?  Is any patch planned for 1.1.x?
> 
>   Pretty much.  The server *should* have a concept of events, as in
> "when to do something".  Plus, it should have a concept of state, as in
> "the request is in state FOO".  Right now, it just brute-forces through
> all requests looking for something to do, and it does a bunch of awkward
> checks to try to figure out what state the request is in.
> 
>   Both current methods are wrong.  I'm fixing both in the CVS head, but
> the patches will *not* go into 1.1.x.  They're just too invasive.

That's cool. Based on that, I will just find values which work well
enough for my purposes and not worry about digging too deeply into the
cause. Thanks,

-David Mitchell

> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> --
>   http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
>   http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| David Mitchell (mitchell at ucar.edu)       Network Engineer IV  |
| Tel: (303) 497-1845                      National Center for  |
| FAX: (303) 497-1818                      Atmospheric Research |
-----------------------------------------------------------------