HUP handling: a thought

[Alan DeKok]

Daniel Larsson wrote:
> I don't see why this should be a requirement either. Most operating
> systems have an abstraction layer on top of the daemon, such as RedHat's
> 'service' command, or FreeBSD's rc.subr framework. Use that as the
> common abstraction, not HUP signals (if it's commonality you're looking
> for).
> 
> Would your SQL scheme support modifying any configuration item,
> including module specific ones?

  That would be the end goal, yes.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog