another cvs SNMP compile problem

[Alan DeKok]

A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
> duh. yes. of course. i see it.  its the return value check
> 
> if (!&mainconfig.do_snmp) return 0;

  That shouldn't have an "&".  The test above checks if there's a
pointer to the variable, which is always true.

> i'm not sure about the much quieter default radius logging though....

  Which log messages are missing?

  Alan DeKok.