2.1.8 and 2.2.0
rssh at gradsoft.com.ua
Thu Oct 22 04:16:41 CEST 2009
I guess, that better name 2.2.0 as 2.2.0-beta ([release 2.1.8 and
2.2.0-beta at same time, later rerelease 2.2.0 during next month or two)
> Is it worth having two versions of the server? i.e. releasing 2.1.8
> *and* 2.2.0 at the same time?
> The reason is that current "stable" branch contains some fairly major
> changes (TCP), and more are on the way. The next things involve
> changing the internal API, which pretty much mandates a 2.2.0.
> However, there are also a number of bug fixes which could go into
> 2.1.7 and any following release.
> The question then is, do we want to have BOTH:
> 2.1.8 = 2.1.7 + bug fixes ONLY
> 2.2.0 = major new features + any fixes
> OR, do we want to give up on 2.1.8, and just release 2.2.0?
> There are pros and cons both ways. Having a stable 2.1.8 is good.
> But maintaining two versions could confuse people.
> Alan DeKok.
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
More information about the Freeradius-Devel