TCP transport again
alex at digriz.org.uk
Sat Sep 26 10:44:47 CEST 2009
Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>> Stefan Winter <stefan.winter at restena.lu> wrote:
>> Tell me if I am being stupid, but why don't we just crank down the MTU
>> for IPv4 traffic to 576
> NFS performance on local links will become horrible. File copies on
> local links will become horrible.
Well, I understand that, but I am guessing not everyone runs an NFS
server or client on their FreeRADIUS boxen...
>> Is there something about EAP that prevents payloads being spread across
>> several EAP-Messages? Apologies for not munching the RFC's, but they
>> do not exactly make for light bedtime reading :)
> Certificates. They can be many kilobytes long, and most ethernet can
> only handle 1.5K packets.
Should have made clearer that I asking "payload being spread across
several packets" rather than "why do EAP packets need to be large".
.sigmonster says: I'm a fuschia bowling ball somewhere in Brittany
More information about the Freeradius-Devel