src_ipaddr with proxies
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Fri Sep 10 16:48:02 CEST 2010
Alexander Clouter wrote:
> Well yes, I do thank you very much. </don't-you-talk-to-me-like-that>
It's been a bad week. You have *no* idea.
> Guess it was my fault not posting the entire tarball of /etc/freeradius
> here blatted onto the mailing list...sorry.
:)
> http://stuff.digriz.org.uk/freeradius-hang.tar.bz2
I'll try to take a look over the next bit.
>> That can be fixed. See the attached patch (event.c). If it works, it
>> should go into 2.1.10.
>>
> Well the assert() issue is no more, so now we are just down to the
> spinning when you have more than one src_ipaddr...
OK. I've committed the event.c patch.
> 'At all', as yeah of cause multiple 'src_ipaddr' makes perfect sense
> within the same home_server stanza... *sigh* Thanks for your vote of
> confidence, if you had spent a minute looking at my original email you
> would have seen when you unroll the templating you get a *single*
> src_ipaddr key/value pair in each home_server.
Yes... well...
> The spinning occurs when you have more than one src_ipaddr present
> across all your home_server definitions, regardless if they are for
> different address families. So even if for the first home_server you
> have v6 and the second home_server you have v4 src_ipaddr...it spins.
> Same happens for v6-v6 and v4-v4 combinations, and of course v6-v6-v4,
> v4-v4-v6, etc etc ad nausem.
Well, I've tried it with v4 && v6 home servers. No hang was seen.
> Where's that patch? I cannot see anything in the git log for any branch
> so I'm guessing it's elsewhere (missing attachment?).
Attached now.
Alan DeKok.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: realms.c.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/attachments/20100910/6710df53/attachment.bin>
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list