Possible bug in configurable failover

[Alan DeKok]

Brian Candler wrote:
> Yes, but the 'if' statement didn't set any rcode at all. All it did was add
> a reply attribute.

  And it doesn't change the preceding reject.

> At the moment, it seems like:
> 
> (1) individual 'if' statements are treated as if they were modules;

  Not really.

> (2) at the end of the 'if' body, the rcode is processed from the time the
> statement was entered, even if one was not set inside it.

  Yes.

> Let me put it another way. The following two bits of code behave completely
> differently:

  The "update" section should behave identically to the "if".

  Alan DeKok.