License for the dictionaries
aland at deployingradius.com
Tue Nov 22 10:48:02 CET 2011
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> To me, the dictionaries are obviously an example of "other work" which
> may be covered by the GPL. Why not?
Some people have suggested that dictionaries are not code, so the GPL
is less relevant.
> Debian are probably going to be the most "difficult" ones as usual.
> Maybe it makes sense to open the discussion on debian-legal again?
I'd prefer not.
> Unless there is one of the more common licenses already on the whitelist
> which can be used instead. I would really just have used GPLv2 myself.
> It has one major advantage: Most people will know what it means to them
> without having to read the fine print of yet another open source
I'm fine with leaving it GPL
More information about the Freeradius-Devel