rlm_acct_unique

[Alan DeKok]

Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> True. I think that's why it changed for 3.0... We should really get rid of acct_unique for 3.0, it offers no functionality over %{md5:}.

  Yes.  I haven't removed it before now because it's being used.  But
changing it in a major version release is fine.

>> In my opinion, it would be better to drop
>> Client-IP-Address - and that would be consistent with the example in the
>> rlm_acct_unique.5 manpage.
> 
> Should be:
> 
> User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, NAS-Identifier, NAS-Port, NAS-Port-ID
> 
> I'll change it once I find non spaghetti powered internet.

  Sure.

  Alan DeKok.