v2.1.x branch renamed to v2.x.x
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Sun Oct 28 13:19:59 CET 2012
On 10/28/2012 10:12 AM, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> Someone was complaining about the branch name v2.1.x being confusing now were on 2.2.0. There's no point in maintaining a branch for v2.1.x because there's never going to be further development.
> To fixup branches in your fork:
Related: has something funny happened to the "master" branch:
+ 15433ac...d7b1d55 master -> upstream/master (forced update)
...and when I merge "upstream/master" into "master" I didn't get a
fast-forward merge, which I should because I keep my "master" pristine,
and only ever branch it.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel