Use of libtool && libltdl
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Mon Sep 3 13:19:50 CEST 2012
Phil Mayers wrote:
> Yeah, libtool is vile +1 kill it.
Also the version in the server is very old...
> One thing to note: if at some point we want to build FR as a native
> windows app, it will be necessary to move the server core into a DLL.
> This is because DLLs cannot load symbols in EXEs in Windows. libtool
> sort of "handles" this for you, so if we kill it we'll need to handle it
> ourselves.
Sure. Or in the short term, statically link the server.
> But TBH that shouldn't be hard; the EXE would just be a stub that called
> the server entry point in the DLL.
Yeah. There really needs to be a "libfreeradius-server.a" library.
It should have all server-side functions. But not the socket handling
code, which can stay in the main exe.
There's also a pthread-win32 library, and a dlopen() wrapper for
Windows. So portability should be really minimal.
Alan DeKok.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list