jdennis at redhat.com
Thu Jul 25 16:04:41 CEST 2013
On 07/25/2013 08:28 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Bill Schoolfield wrote:
>> DoWe have developed a module that we intend to include in our rpm
>> package. For licensing reasons we will not be distributing freeradius
>> itself. Instead the freeradius rpm will be a pre-requisite.
> If you have a module which depends on FreeRADIUS, your choices are:
> a) GPL the module
> b) don't redistribute the module
> That's pretty much what the GPL says. (Modulo 3 pages of legalese)
I'll admit I get confused when it comes to licensing issues, but isn't
the library they would be linking against LGPL? That's the license in
the FreeRADIUS library section. And I thought LGPL gave you the right to
link against LGPL libraries without providing sources.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel