Current dynamic SQL client format...

[A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk]

Hi,

> Does anyone see issues with allowing an alternative schema (whilst supporting the old one), where the primary key was the client identifier, and then just had attribute and value columns? It would also support arbitrary client attributes like the current static client definitions do.

that would be nice - far easier than the current updates needed to add
an extra value - which are all very sensitive on order too - eg the current
schema doesnt support coa_server or CUI etc etc.  

dyanmic_clients virtual server would also have to be updated to
reflect this change

alan