Initial support of Multi Valued Attributes operators

[Brian Candler]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:33:55PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote:
> I wonder if that might not be a better solution; for the == and =~
> operators, loop over all and match if any matches. This seems "least
> surprising" to me.

I do agree with that.

> You would still then want a "match all" operator, which would need
> to be new.

Would you?

if ( ! (Tmp-String-0 != "foo") )

if ( ! (Tmp-String-0 !~ /foo/) )

Regards,

Brian.