mschap via ntlm_auth over a socket

[Phil Mayers]

On 03/12/14 16:07, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>
>> On 3 Dec 2014, at 11:06, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/12/14 15:59, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see any reason people would wrap ntlm_auth, or why the
>>> arguments would change.
>>
>> We *do* wrap it currently, and I can think of not-ridiculous reasons to do so in some cases.
>
> Do you wrap it in such a way that it would not pass the --helper-protocol flag through?

No, can't think of a reason to do that.