Thoughts on -std=c11
mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk
Wed Dec 3 17:58:19 CET 2014
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:39:07AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Just like the multitides of "I'm using 2.1.12" now :(
> Which is exactly my problem. You can stick with an old
> version, and get no upgrades, or you can upgrade to get new
> It is *highly* unproductive to support systems which are 5-6
> years old.
Oh, I highly agree; just predicting what will happen.
My personal opinion right now is to have a clear "we do not
support FR < 2.2.x" on the web site, and refuse to answer any
questions until people upgrade. The questions about 1.x and 2.1.12
get pretty annoying.
In fact, maybe 1.1.8 should be removed from the front page and
download pages of freeradius.org as well. It looks like it's still
a valid version.
But in terms of -std=c11 in 3.1+, go for it.
Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk>
Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
More information about the Freeradius-Devel