talloc & threads in rlm_eap

[Phil Mayers]

On 23/06/14 17:48, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 23/06/14 17:13, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>> call backtrace_print(&vp_bt
>
> $3 = (const VALUE_PAIR *) 0x7f07f003e780
> (gdb) call backtrace_print(&vp_bt, 0x7f07f003e780)
> No backtrace available for 0x7f07f003e780
>
>
>

Doesn't fr_do_bt need to be mutex'd off the cbuff?

Also, don't see what happens with marker->obj - thrown away? So don't 
see how backtrace_print() can ever find it?