3.1.x consistency check

[Matthew Newton]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:52:28PM +0000, Matthew Newton wrote:
> > It may be worth doing a dev build of v3.0.x (if you're not
> > already) just to see if the validity checks catch the issue.
> 
> That's a good idea. It'll probably be after the weekend now. I've
> just rebuilt 3.0.x and pushed it to the live server, so I'll leave
> that for the weekend and see how it holds out. If it crashes like
> before it probably won't be until 9am Monday morning anyway.

Follow on from this.

The (non-dev) build from Friday with SoH bugfix has run all
weekend and through both the busy time of yesterday morning and
this morning without crashing, so I think that patch has fixed it.
Thanks! Previously would crash within a few minutes or hours at
the most.

I've just put a dev build on the other server and about to push
all load on to it, but it's not crashed on the first packet like
3.1 did so hopefully the consistency checks are consistent :)

I'll probably try bumping up to 3.1 again after this, "just
because"...

Cheers,

Matthew


-- 
Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at le.ac.uk>

Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom

For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>