bbauman at oit.rutgers.edu
Fri Jul 22 02:44:10 CEST 2016
Just out of curiousity, why not just include EPEL and use clang?
I think the clang in the repo is new enough to compile 3.1.x and it seems like it's easier than installing the devtools gcc. Is there a downside to using clang?
From: Freeradius-Devel <freeradius-devel-bounces+bbauman=rutgers.edu at lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:10 PM
To: FreeRadius developers mailing list
Subject: Re: Building RPMs
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:49:43PM -0400, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> > to get gcc available.
> > And people pay to go through this.
> They suppress their gag reflex, and, with a large mouthful of
> RHEL dong, say, "But we only want to use the official RedHat
> supported version".
And we're expected to support it :(
Just successfully built 3.0.12 RPMs. List of commands to run is
five times longer than Debian, but got there in the end.
Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk>
Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
FreeRADIUS -- developers' list info<http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html>
Developers' List Information. The freeradius-devel mailing list is for developers of the FreeRADIUS server. There are a few house-rules to which we'd like everybody ...
More information about the Freeradius-Devel