Building RPMs

[Peter Lambrechtsen]

If it were me I would have a few versions of the spec file.
Freeradius-rhelcentos.spec
Freeradius-rhelcentosepel.spec

As then if you don't have epel then you probably won't be using redis so
that module can get removed. So that with pure rhel you can get a
successful build.

Otherwise just have comments in the spec saying if you don't want redis
comment these lines out.

Depends on how much you want to hold the hands either in the spec or in the
wiki.

On 22/07/2016 20:18, "Stefan Paetow" <Stefan.Paetow at jisc.ac.uk> wrote:

> To some organisations, EPEL is not acceptable as a repository because it's
> not curated by RedHat or people RedHat trusts.
>
> Stefan Paetow
> Moonshot Industry & Research Liaison Coordinator
>
> t: +44 (0)1235 822 125
> gpg: 0x3FCE5142
> xmpp: stefanp at jabber.dev.ja.net
> skype: stefan.paetow.janet
>
> jisc.ac.uk
>
> Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by
> guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT
> No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc¹s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower
> Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22/07/2016, 01:44, "Freeradius-Devel on behalf of Bruce Bauman"
> <freeradius-devel-bounces+stefan.paetow=jisc.ac.uk at lists.freeradius.org on
> behalf of bbauman at oit.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> >Just out of curiousity, why not just include EPEL and use clang?
> >
> >
> >I think the clang in the repo is new enough to compile 3.1.x and it seems
> >like it's easier than installing the devtools gcc. Is there a downside to
> >using clang?
> >
> >
> >-- Bruce
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> >From: Freeradius-Devel
> ><freeradius-devel-bounces+bbauman=rutgers.edu at lists.freeradius.org> on
> >behalf of Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk>
> >Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:10 PM
> >To: FreeRadius developers mailing list
> >Subject: Re: Building RPMs
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:49:43PM -0400, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> >> >
> >> > to get gcc available.
> >> >
> >> > And people pay to go through this.
> >>
> >> They suppress their gag reflex, and, with a large mouthful of
> >> RHEL dong, say, "But we only want to use the official RedHat
> >> supported version".
> >
> >And we're expected to support it :(
> >
> >Just successfully built 3.0.12 RPMs. List of commands to run is
> >five times longer than Debian, but got there in the end.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Matthew
> >
> >
> >--
> >Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk>
> >
> >Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
> >I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
> >
> >For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp at le.ac.uk>
> >-
> >List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> >http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
> >FreeRADIUS -- developers' list
> >info<http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html>
> >www.freeradius.org
> >Developers' List Information. The freeradius-devel mailing list is for
> >developers of the FreeRADIUS server. There are a few house-rules to which
> >we'd like everybody ...
> >
> >
> >-
> >List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> >http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html