a.cudbardb at freeradius.org
Thu Oct 27 18:07:49 CEST 2016
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Matthew Newton <mcn4 at leicester.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:01:00PM +0000, Stefan Paetow wrote:
>>>> At this point, if you need the features in v3.1., just use the v3.1.x
>>>> branch. It's stable, and used by many people in production.
>> There are still regular checkins... This bugs our dev :-)
> Sounds like your problem then :)
>> So if we were to choose a specific Github commit, we should be ok. The
>> blessed release also gives someone paranoid enough about this reassurance
>> that that release is stable enough to go with it.
> TBH, I do that with 3.0.x as well anyway.
> No software is perfect. "Releases" are just a thing to make people
> who don't understand think they're getting something more stable.
> There are still bugs.
> I'd just pick a commit and run with it, then you can cherry-pick
> any future bugfixes if you need them.
> I *think* there's still an issue with EAP-TLS on Windows with 3.1?
> Haven't had time to look at it for a while. Stability is still to
> be found in 3.0. :)
I think it's only weird ones where you're combining EAP-TLS and PEAP, and I think it's broken in v3.0.x as well.
I... I guess you could say "fixed" but it wasn't really broken... Um, changed the fragmentation behaviour back to v3.0.x style in v3.1.x.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Freeradius-Devel