Enhancement of timestamp logging
Geaaru
geaaru at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 11:09:28 CET 2017
Yes, I know that code is public, I sent a pull request on github (see
pull request #1917).
But FWIS on xlat.c file (on tree 3.0.x) or on xlat_eval.c (on tree
4.0.x) there isn't a management of nanoseconds or milliseconds on
logging messages.
I don't find where could be currently used a timestamp with
milliseconds or nanosecods on logging.
FWIS currently logging timestamp with milliseconds or nanoseconds is
not supported by freeradius. There is a '%T' option but milliseconds is
set statically to 0000000.
I currently patched my freeradius code to permit a more efficient
timestamp logging, let me known if you want patch this on official
tree.
Good work
G.
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 4:26 AM, Geaaru <geaaru at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you very much for reply.
> >
> > Can you give me what is patch about this?
>
> See the git repository on github. The code is public.
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list