Memory big problem

[Dmitry V. Pleganoff]

By the way, rlm_checkval meets in most cases losses

==8528== 200448 bytes in 783 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 178
of 190
...
==8528==    by 0x1BB83E41: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
==8528==    by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275)
...

==8528== 60416 bytes in 59 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 162 of
190
...
==8528==    by 0x1BB88BF0: regexec (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
==8528==    by 0x1D310FF4: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:281)
...

==8528== 55800 bytes in 15 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 159 of
190
...
==8528==    by 0x1BB83EBF: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
==8528==    by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275)
...

==8528== 22320 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 151 of 190
...
==8528==    by 0x1BB83EBF: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
==8528==    by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275)
...

etc.