Memory big problem

[Alan DeKok]

"Dmitry V. Pleganoff" <dimple at mail.primorye.ru> wrote:
> Thanks for corrections, valgrind has shown MUCH less losses.
> 
> ==9603== 21 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 27 of 124
> ==9603==    at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130)
> ==9603==    by 0x1D1A8E1F: ldap_instantiate (rlm_ldap.c:429)

  Fixed.

> ==9603== 45 bytes in 6 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 44 of 124
> ==9603==    at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130)
> ==9603==    by 0x1BB4708F: strdup (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x804ECF2: cf_item_parse (conffile.c:747)

  Fixed.

> ==9603== 492 (108 direct, 384 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely
> lost in loss record 64 of 124
> ==9603==    at 0x1B90659D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130)
> ==9603==    by 0x1BBB6EE6: (within /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x1BBB6788: __nss_database_lookup (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x1BE0A797: ???
> ==9603==    by 0x1BB76A4B: getgrnam_r (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so)

  Can't fix.

> ==9603== 340 bytes in 5 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 81 of 124
> ==9603==    at 0x1B906F75: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:175)
> ==9603==    by 0x1B8F2678: (within /lib/ld-2.3.2.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x1B8F294B: _dl_allocate_tls (in /lib/ld-2.3.2.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x1B93E24A: allocate_stack (in /lib/tls/libpthread-0.60.so)
> ==9603==    by 0x1B93DC54: pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1 (in

  Can't fix.

  Thanks for the report.

  Alan DeKok.