Radius, Radsec, Diameter [was: Silly question - secure Radius?]
hecker at enst.fr
Thu Jul 14 21:26:58 CEST 2005
apparently we do agree. thanks to Josh for his comment. just one thing:
Alan DeKok wrote:
> Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>>I think the point the original poster was making was that Diameter
>>allows arbitrary conversations between NASes and servers that are
>>initiated by either party, via "applications", in an extensible manner.
> Which clients support diameter? I can't think of any.
> Until Cisco starts shipping diameter clients in their boxes, all of
> this discussion is wishful thinking.
see? as i said: now you _started_ talking about God :-)
More information about the Freeradius-Users