Radius, Radsec, Diameter [was: Silly question - secure Radius?]

[Artur Hecker]

apparently we do agree. thanks to Josh for his comment. just one thing:


Alan DeKok wrote:
> Josh Howlett <Josh.Howlett at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>>I think the point the original poster was making was that Diameter
>>allows arbitrary conversations between NASes and servers that are
>>initiated by either party, via "applications", in an extensible manner.
> 
> 
>   Yup.
> 
>   Which clients support diameter?  I can't think of any.
> 
>   Until Cisco starts shipping diameter clients in their boxes, all of
> this discussion is wishful thinking.

see? as i said: now you _started_ talking about God :-)


ciao
artur