Duplicate requests in a session

[Santiago Balaguer García]

>   They primary key should be a synthetic field, and not something
>derived directly from the packet.  Calling it 'acctuniqueid' is
>awkward, maybe renaming it to 'radiuskey'?
>
>   It can then be used in the SQL queries as
>%{Acct-Unique-ID:-%{Acct-Session-id}}, which should be safe for all
>configuration.
>

NOP, the default definition of the acctuniqueid attribute is correct.

acct_unique {
                key = "User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, 
Client-IP-Address, NAS-Port"
        }

  It is more possible that a user connect and disconnect several times in a 
same session. I think it is task of the NAS to assign a unique session id to 
a user. With acct_unique specification freeradius builds acctuniqueid 
attribute.

This is my reason for the change. Do you agree???

_________________________________________________________________
Grandes éxitos, superhéroes, imitaciones, cine y TV... 
http://es.msn.kiwee.com/ Lo mejor para tu móvil.