ippool behavior

[Alan DeKok]

Peter Manckok <peter_manckok at yahoo.es> wrote:
> 1) Is this a correct behavior?

  Looks like it.

> 2) The FreeRadius assigns the IP 192.168.3.181. Why
> does not it start assigning the IP 192.168.1.1?

  Because it's hard to do.  It's a lot easier to just assign random
IP's from the pool.

> 3) If I send another Access-Request packet with a
> different NAS-Port attribute, I observe that
> FreeRadius assigns an IP that is not consecutive with
> regard to the previous IP. Is this a correct behavior
> or am I doing something wrong?

  It's correct.

> 4) Which is the consequence of deleting the db.ippool
> and db.ipindex files?

  The pools disappear.

> 5) How does the rlm_ippool module free the IP address
> assigned?

  When it gets a new request with the same NAS-Port, or it gets an
accounting stop for that NAS-Port.

> Sorry about the large of the mail (and my poor
> english)

  Your english is fine.

  Alan DeKok.