Version 2.0 is a lot closer to reality...

[Alexander Serkin]

Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>>> In 2.0 we lack the group checks:
>>>     
> I thought group checks were slightly broken since 1.1.3 anyway.... if 
> not can someone please close the bug report :)
> 
> At least in 1.1.5 it doesn't fall through properly if a user belongs to 
> multiple groups and the check items in the first group  partially match..
> 

Hm. I did not notice that. Walked through 1.1.3,4,5 transparently 
without problems for users living in 2 or more groups. Though i slightly 
modified  group authorization queries and usergroup table (added CLID 
field).

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
Alexander