SQL Groups broken in v 1.1.5 but fixed in CVS head :)
Arran Cudbard-Bell
A.Cudbard-Bell at sussex.ac.uk
Fri Apr 6 21:43:30 CEST 2007
Hi,
Updated The sql querys to honour priority field, and happily it seems
that rlm_sql processes groups in the order they come out of the
database... which is good.
What the packets below are show, is that if the group with the highest
priority has all it's check items match, then it's reply items are added
fine.
However if the first group doesn't match then the other groups arn't
processed ! So although the user is still authorised via LDAP none of
the group reply items are sent :(
If the priority of the groups is reversed, so the 'nas_admins' group
comes out of the database first, then the nas_admins reply items work,
but the roaming_users group doesn't *sigh*.
Would also appear that CIDR ip notation doesn't work for NAS-IP-Address
... But thats not too bad, as you can stick the relevant NAS's in a
huntgroup and check against that instead.
* Confirmed this is broken in branch_1_1
* Confirmed this is fixed in CVS head with group priority being honoured
properly.
Don't suppose there's any chance of bringing some of the changes in the
CVS Head rlm_sql over to branch_1_1 for the next 1.1.* release is there ?
.... Namely the new sql_clients function with the user definable query,
and the new groups handling. As the groups handling is a pretty major
bug, and i'm sure
anyone else using sql will be having issues with the later releases.
Oh and a huge great big thanks, to whoever fixed rlm_sql in the cvs head
... I think it was Alexander Serkin. :)
*Rad Group Check
SQL query:* SELECT radgroupcheck . id , radgroupcheck . GroupName ,
radgroupcheck . Attribute , radgroupcheck . Value , radgroupcheck . op
FROM radgroupcheck , usergroup WHERE usergroup . UserName = 'ac221' AND
usergroup . GroupName = radgroupcheck . GroupName ORDER BY usergroup .
priority DESC , radgroupcheck . GroupName LIMIT 0, 30 ;
*Rows:* 2
id GroupName Attribute Value op
5 roaming_users Service-Type Framed-User ==
1 nas_admins Service-Type NAS-Prompt-User ==
*Rad Group Reply*
*SQL query:* SELECT radgroupreply . id , radgroupreply . GroupName ,
radgroupreply . Attribute , radgroupreply . Value , radgroupreply . op
FROM radgroupreply , usergroup WHERE usergroup . UserName = 'ac221' AND
usergroup . GroupName = radgroupreply . GroupName ORDER BY usergroup .
priority DESC , radgroupreply . GroupName LIMIT 0, 30 ;
*Rows:* 7
id GroupName Attribute Value op
3 roaming_users Tunnel-Type 13 =
4 roaming_users Tunnel-Medium-Type 6 =
5 roaming_users Tunnel-Private-Group-ID 134 =
8 roaming_users Service-Type 4 =
10 roaming_users Fall-Through yes =
1 nas_admins Service-Type 6 =
9 nas_admins Fall-Through yes =
Sending Access-Request of id 178 to 139.184.**.*** port 1812
User-Name = "ac221"
User-Password = "nopassword"
Service-Type = NAS-Prompt-User
NAS-IP-Address = 139.184.8.1
rad_recv: Access-Accept packet from host 139.184.**.***:1812, id=178,
length=20
Sending Access-Request of id 225 to 139.184.**.*** port 1812
User-Name = "ac221"
User-Password = "nopassword"
Service-Type = Framed-User
NAS-IP-Address = 139.184.8.1
rad_recv: Access-Accept packet from host 139.184.**.***:1812, id=225,
length=43
Tunnel-Type:0 = VLAN
Tunnel-Medium-Type:0 = IEEE-802
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:0 = "134"
Service-Type = Callback-Framed-User
Thanks,
Arran
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20070406/93a636d5/attachment.html>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list