Segmentation fault on sigHUP
Milan Holub
holub at thenet.ch
Wed Apr 11 16:30:53 CEST 2007
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:02:15PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > Do you have in mind a favorite technique for signaling daemons that
> > the config files have changed? HUP is a common way to do it, but I'm
> > sure there are other ways.
>
> A command-line tool that uses some other method to update the server
> configuration. It means that the server gets told "X has changed", or
> "delete client Y", which is hugely less intrusive than a HUP.
>
> HUPs are like kicking the server in the head, and then expecting it to
> be nice to you. It can be done, but it takes work.
==> I've found really useful the idea of telling freeradius
to reload via snmp - could be such functionality easily kept when using
your proposed approach?
>
> Alan DeKok.
> --
> http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
> http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Milan Holub
holub (at) thenet (dot) ch
--------------------------------------
TheNet-Internet Services AG,
im Bernertechnopark, Morgenstr. 129
CH-3018, Bern, Switzerland
031 998 4333, Fax 031 998 4330
http://www.thenet.ch
http://wlan.thenet.ch
--------------------------------------
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list