Segmentation fault on sigHUP
aland at deployingradius.com
Wed Apr 11 17:48:52 CEST 2007
Milan Holub wrote:
> - we are keeping NAS entries in DB.
Then the server should re-load them via reading the DB.
> - these entries are edited by operation guys via web interface
> - when a new NAS entry is added then we need to reload/restart
> - we reload freeradius using SNMP write query(can be done via web
> interface as well; without need of ssh to radius server)
If the server automatically discovers NAS changes from the DB, then
the server doesn't need to be reloaded.
i.e. You're changing *one* thing: a NAS. You're then telling the
server to reload *everything*. That's where the expense and complexity
> In general when restarting the server you might loose some radius
> packets(especially on high loaded server), don't you?
> ==> what do you imagine under these "features"? Basically I thought HUP
> is good for reloading config files when one does not want to bring the
> server down but wants to bring into effect some minor config change.
I am trying to say that there are OTHER ways to perform some minor
config change than HUP. HUP should be the *last* resort.
> ==> is there any other use of HUP?
No. HUP is *only* to notify the server of configuration changes.
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
More information about the Freeradius-Users