freeradius & redback sms

[Samson Martinez]

My apologies for including the redback trace - won't happen again.

1.0.1 because it was already installed and running - haven't had a
chance to upgrade.

Thanks for the feedback.

-Samson

-----Original Message-----
From: freeradius-users-bounces+samson=motive.com at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+samson=motive.com at lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:18 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: freeradius & redback sms

Hi,

> We are running freeradius version 1.0.1, I've added the

1.0.1? why? 

> 09:10:40 9May2007: %RAD-7-SEND_IPADDR: Sent to 10.103.0.4:  port 1812
> 09:10:40 9May2007: %RAD-7-SPKT: Sent packet:
>   0x01 00 00 4f 65 0f 55 dd 7c a2 0b 7d a4 bf a0 b3
>     85 37 a3 4e 01 0d 6a 61 6b 65 31 40 6c 6f 63 61
>     6c 03 13 01 c7 24 7a b9 3e 1f 8d ec bc ea 4d 35
>     84 10 2d cf 20 09 52 65 64 42 61 63 6b 06 06 00
>     00 00 02 07 06 00 00 00 01 05 06 07 00 00 01
> 09:10:40 9May2007: %RAD-7-RPKT: Received packet:
>   0x02 00 00 20 c8 c3 8a c4 dc d3 6a 6b 59 a4 25 57
>     ea 1a ba 06 06 06 00 00 00 02 07 06 00 00 00 01

no. this is not the redback support list. this is the freeradius list. 
the 'rule' of this list is you post (obfuscating confidential
information)
the output of  'radiusd -X' 

> Speaking of which, what should my nastype in the clients.conf file be?
I
> entered redback but I couldn't confirm if that was correct.

if redback is unknown or cannot be probed by the tools which utilise
that
entry, then 'other' is the answer

alan
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html