in vs. out
wlan at mac.com
wlan at mac.com
Thu Oct 4 11:37:46 CEST 2007
Hi Alan,
> No. The standard is the RFC. The portmaster text is just
> additional
> text from the people building RADIUS systems.
>
> It is NOT vendor specific. Do NOT say it is vendor specific.
>
Ok... I deserve a good slap for that one ;)
I will start thinking of it as vendor specific brokenness. But, my
reality remains the same.. the meaning depends on the NAS being
broken or not.
>>> Follow the standards. Do not follow broken vendors.
>>
>> It actually isn't just that one vendor... in fact, if not
>> mistaken, much
>> of the commercial wlan gear I've worked with used the above
>> meaning. It
>> would be curious to see a list of vendors and how they implemented
>> their
>> accounting... if we all checked the manuals of the devices we
>> use, we
>> could all help build that list in the freeradius wiki!
>
> Feel free to start this effort.
>
I will ... maybe at:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/NAS_Accounting_Differences
> There are many other vendor products that are very broken with
> respect
> to RADIUS. Do NOT follow any individual vendor, or even groups of
> vendors. Follow the standards. If the standards aren't clear, ask on
> the IETF RADEXT mailing list. The people there should be able to give
> conclusive answers.
>
Unfortunately, from a back-end perspective, if having to support a
variety of 'broken' commercial vendors, one doesn't have much choice
(apart from not supporting these vendors). I guess we have to live
with it as it would probably be difficult for these vendors to change
their ways now...
David
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list