RPM Build Errors
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Sun Apr 6 22:04:08 CEST 2008
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 08:06:40PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> I can see two options, neither very pleasant :o(
>
> 1. For the short term distributions (Fedora, Ubuntu), volunteer to be
> a packager. In principle I could do this for Fedora; in practice I have
> no time or patience for the politics involved.
Fedora does follow the releases pretty close, I think. They now have
version 2.0.2. You can always trigger the maintainer (who's name is
in the spec file) for upgrading.
> 2. For the long term distributions (e.g. RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu LTS)
> politely ask the distribution to either track no more than 6 months old,
> or if they are unable/unwilling, ask them not to include FreeRadius.
>
> It's GPLed software so of course they're free to refuse the latter; but
> they would probably honour it. Whether it's desirable is another matter
I don't think they will honour that. And I think it's a unrealistic
request. As I said in an old thread (when I asked something related
to version 1.0.1 (!), as included in RHEL4): on this list you're of
course all free to ignore questions you don't like, but I honoustly
hope we also stay all free to ask questions about older releases.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list