unlang to overcome cisco zero tag issue and for dynamic vlan assignment
bluelip at gmail.com
bluelip at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 02:11:35 CEST 2008
We'd like to setup the following:
A workstation is booted, the supplicant asks for the credentials, the cisco switch pa
sses the credentials to a freeradius server, freeradius authenticates the user to an
edirectory ldap server, freeradius decides which Tunnel-Private-Group-Id to send bac
k to the switch to place the user into the correct VLAN.
The authentication/authorization works fine. The cisco switch accepts the returned VL
AN info if we 'hard code it into the users files such as with:
DEFAULT
Tunnel-Private-Group-ID:1 := 901
Tunnel-Type:1 = VLAN,
Tunnel-Medium-Type:1 = IEEE-802
We attempted to make the configuration more generic by setting Tunnel-Private-Group-I
D equal to an LDAP attribute in ldap.attrmap. This would automatically associate the
VLAN ID w/ the user.
replyItem Tunnel-Private-Group-ID ourldapattribforthevlan
That didn't work because freeradius wasn't associating a tag with the attribute(or wa
s setting it to zero when responding to the switch. A wireshark capture confirmed the
0 tag. We attempted to add a :1 after Tunnel-Private-Group-ID, but that didn't pan o
ut either.
We then attempted to use unlang in the users file to accomplish the same thing. (Tunn
el-Client-Endpoint was added to ldap.attrmap as dummy variable to hold the 'ourldapat
tribforthevlan' from LDAP)
DEFAULT
Tunnel-Private-Group-ID:1 := `%{reply:Tunnel-Client-Endpoint}`,
Tunnel-Type:1 = VLAN,
Tunnel-Medium-Type:1 = IEEE-802
With this configuration, we tried countless combinations of backticks, single quotes,
and double quotes. The best response we could send back to the switch was:
Tunnel-Type:1 = VLAN
Tunnel-Medium-Type:1 = IEEE-802
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:1 = ""
Has anyone else come across the issue with Cisco not dealing w/ 0 tags? Is there a wa
y to use unlang to pull in the variables to be used in the users file?
Thank you for taking the time to read this. After a couple of days of searching, we s
till haven't come up w/ the correct search terms for google.
Thank you,
Mike Coles
--
This message was sent on behalf of bluelip at gmail.com at openSubscriber.com
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org/topic.html
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list