rlm_dbm segfault debug

[Patrick Medina]

--- Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:

>   Is there a pressing need to use rlm_dbm?  In

Just (blindly) following "good" practice.

> 2.0.0, the "users" file should scale to 100's of
> 1000's of users.  (i.e. I've tested it at that.)  It
> takes a few seconds to start the server, but it's
> just as fast as rlm_dbm would be.

Tested and verified working your CVS update.  But
since you put it that way above, I'll stick to a plain
users file then as our user population is not even
5,000.

Thank you for the very fast response, fix, and useful info.


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ