Traffic volume accounting

[Spam Eater]

Thanks!

It turns out that my problem was in fact, another one.
I was using radreply with custom parameters that I check against in bash
scripts.
The problem was freeRadius not sending to the NAS the correct parameters in
radreply.
Somehow, freeRadius ignores all parameters in radreply as sson as it sees
one custom parameter.
This issue was solved creating a clone of radreply, to be used exclusively
by bash scripts.

Thank you!

On Jan 18, 2008 2:22 PM, Edvin Seferovic <edvin.seferovic at kolp.at> wrote:

>  >Is it possible to have a counter setup to achieve this?
>
>
>
> Yes. It is.
>
>
>
> >I'd like to know if someone has implemented realtime upload/download
> limitations and what methods were used.
>
>
>
> Realtime traffic accounting would have to be supported by your NAS.  Any
> kind of traffic/bandwidth limitations has to be supported by you NAS, you
> have to tell freeRADIUS what data to store and how to calculate the values..
> and of course, what attributes should it answer to NAS !
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> E:S
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20080121/1f918488/attachment.html>