NAS list update without restarting radius server.

Arran Cudbard-Bell A.Cudbard-Bell at sussex.ac.uk
Thu Jan 24 00:18:32 CET 2008


Alan DeKok wrote:
> Pawel Cieplinski wrote:
>> I wont be adding NASes, but users will do, so i am thinking 0-10 a day. 
>>
>> Linking to a dynamic list using interal its not a good solution, becouse i
>> will need to wait for list update after adding NAS.
> 
>   If the list update takes longer than 1/10 of a second, something is
> very wrong.

Ours often takes ~20 seconds for 600 NAS.

> 
>> Other solution i am thinking is to run two instances of server and restart
>> them in round robin and use iptables to redirect packets to actual working
>> server.
> 
>   Yuck.  That's a lot more complicated.
> 
>> Goal is to serveradius to third party as a service, so users will add their
>> own nases, modified them etc, at this stage i cannot really say how many
>> times a day i will need a restart, but i am wondering about also about
>> following soltion:
> 
>   For all that work, why not just fix the server so that it can be
> safely HUP'd?
> 
>   Honestly, I'm wondering why people will put huge efforts into building
> and maintaining multiple machines rather than doing tiny bits of coding.
>  If the functionality is *that* important, it should be important enough
> to add to the server core.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html




More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list