2.0.1 Segfault
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Thu Jan 31 18:31:49 CET 2008
Michael J. Hartwick wrote:
> I will see what I can find out for sure. I think that it might be
> being added by the server that is proxying the packets to us. They
> insisted that it works properly,
If it's sending zero-length attributes, it's violating RFC 2865:
...
text 1-253 octets containing UTF-8 encoded 10646 [7]
characters. Text of length zero (0) MUST NOT be sent;
omit the entire attribute instead.
...
i.e. their local configuration is wrong, AND perhaps their RADIUS
server is broken.
> I have taken the radius.c file from CVS and put it into 2.0.1 and so
> far it seems to be doing exactly what it is supposed to be. I haven't
> seen those empty pairs coming up while running it under gdb with -X.
Yes. Those attributes are *completely* suppressed. They're useless,
and shouldn't ever be created.
Alan DeKok.
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list